The World Cricketers' Association (WCA) has publicly questioned the International Cricket Council's (ICC) decision to alter the format of next year's men's 50-over World Cup without consulting the players who will be most affected. The change introduces a new 'Super Series' round for the three lowest-ranked qualified teams, with one advancing to the main group stage—a move the ICC says ensures 'meaningful contest,' but which players and their representatives argue undermines the integrity of qualification and the sport's stated goal of global growth. Main Developments The ICC announced the format revision on Thursday, keeping the World Cup as a 14-team event but adding a 'Super Series' round for the three lowest-ranked qualified sides. One of those teams will then advance to the main group stage. The WCA responded Friday, with chief executive Tom Moffat stating that while the ICC has the right to determine event structures, 'significant changes deserve genuine consultation, transparency and a clear explanation' when players and countries have already invested years pursuing qualification opportunities. Netherlands captain Scott Edwards voiced disappointment, noting that 'qualifying for an ODI World Cup is a huge achievement for any country' and that decisions like this 'make it harder for associate nations to play against the best teams in the world.' Ireland captain Paul Stirling highlighted the value smaller teams bring, pointing to the football World Cup as evidence that expanding opportunities benefits the sport. Read also: FIFA to Award Championship Rings to 2026 World Cup Winners Background The World Cup, to be co-hosted by South Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia, has long featured a 14-team format, with associate nations earning spots through a rigorous qualification process. The ICC's new 'Super Series' effectively alters the pathway after teams have already earned their places, creating a secondary barrier for the lowest-ranked qualified sides. The WCA, which represents international players, has previously advocated for greater transparency in ICC decision-making, particularly on matters affecting player careers and national team development. Why It Matters The controversy underscores a tension between the ICC's stated ambition of growing cricket globally and decisions that may limit opportunities for emerging cricket nations. Associate teams like the Netherlands and Ireland have proven competitive in recent World Cups, and reducing their chances to face top sides could stunt the sport's expansion. The lack of player consultation also risks eroding trust between the governing body and the athletes who drive the game's popularity, potentially affecting future participation and investment in non-traditional markets. What's Next The WCA has called for a clear explanation from the ICC regarding the rationale behind the format change and the absence of consultation. It remains unclear whether the ICC will engage with players or adjust the structure before the tournament begins. The affected teams—the three lowest-ranked qualified sides—must now prepare for a revised path to the main event, with their captains publicly signaling disappointment that could influence public and sponsor sentiment.